Turn activity data into productivity trends you can explain
Compare people, teams and periods to find changes in focus, workload and output.
Worktivity productivity analysis splits working minutes by how your organization rated the application they were spent in, then shows how that split moves over time, how two people, teams or periods compare and at which hours the work actually happens.
What productivity analysis shows
A split you can check
Working minutes count as productive, neutral or unproductive according to the rating of the application in front. The percentage is minutes divided by minutes; nothing is weighted or guessed.
Trends
Group a range by day, week or month and see whether the productive share rose, fell or held steady between its first and second half.
Comparisons
Put two periods, two employees or two teams side by side on the same measures: the three shares, tracked time and activity level.
A heatmap of the working day
Days against hours of the day, in your organization's time zone. The darker the cell, the larger the productive share of that hour.
What teams use productivity analysis for
The numbers start a conversation. They are not a grade.
Checking whether a change worked
Compare the month before and after a new tool, process or hire to see whether anything moved.
Finding the focus hours
The heatmap shows when productive work concentrates, useful when meetings keep landing on the best hours.
Team figures that add up
Team and organization shares are rebuilt from minutes rather than averaged over people, so a short day does not weigh as much as a full one.
Explaining an odd number
An unexpected neutral share usually means an application nobody has rated yet, and the apps summary shows which one.
What it does not do
What productivity analysis does not claim.
Only as good as your ratings
Unrated applications count as neutral. Rating an app also relabels minutes already recorded, so past ranges can read differently afterwards.
Not a measure of output
The split says which applications working time was spent in. It says nothing about the quality of the work done there.
Some views depend on the plan
Trends, comparison and the heatmap are included on some plans only. Where they are not, the screen says so and requests no data.
Teams that get the most out of it
Productivity analysis is most useful where computer work is the work.
Software teams
Time in editors and tools against time in chat and meetings, week by week.
Agencies and studios
How much of the week goes to production tools rather than admin.
Contact centres and BPO
Productive share per team across shifts, with idle time kept separate.
Finance and back office
Time in core systems against time elsewhere, compared across teams.
Remote and hybrid teams
Remote and office days measured the same way and compared side by side.
Growing companies
A baseline before a reorganisation, and a comparison after it.
Other features that pair well with this one
Every feature shares the same data layer, so combining them takes no extra setup.
Review Apps
Rate the apps and websites your team uses per team, and the productivity reports follow your ratings.
Learn moreProductivity Coach
A written AI report on one person's working period: burnout risk, productive share, work pattern and an action plan.
Learn moreTime Tracking
Shift, break and idle time recorded minute by minute by the desktop app, with nobody filling in a timesheet.
Learn more
Turn a month of tracked time into trends
Rate the applications your team uses, track a few weeks and compare the periods that matter to you.
No credit card required