See how your team's working time is really spent
Productive, neutral and unproductive time per team, based on applications you rate yourself.
Worktivity records which application or website each working minute went to. You decide, team by team, which of them count as productive, and the reports split working time accordingly. The result is a picture of how the team works, not a score for any one person.
How team productivity is measured
The questions teams ask before they rely on the numbers.
Where does the productivity figure come from?
Each working minute carries the application that was in front at the time. That application's rating, productive, neutral or unproductive, decides which share the minute falls into. Break and idle minutes are left out, so the split is always of working time.
Who decides what counts as productive?
Owners and co-owners, under Review apps. Ratings are kept per team, so a design tool can be productive for designers and neutral for sales. Worktivity AI suggests a value, but reports only use the one a person sets.
What happens to apps nobody has rated?
Their minutes are recorded as neutral until someone rates them, which is why a new workspace shows a large neutral share. A rating set later also updates past days.
Can we compare teams or periods?
Advanced insights compares two teams, two people or two periods on the same metrics, shows trends by day, week or month, and draws a heatmap of when in the day productive work happens.
What about work away from the keyboard?
Meetings, calls and reading can be logged with a work note, or the application can be listed as always counted as working. Either way the time does not drift into idle.

What your team gets out of it
A shared definition of productive
Rating the tools once per team gives everyone the same yardstick, and the ratings are visible rather than hidden in an algorithm.
Trends instead of snapshots
Weekly and monthly trends show whether a change in process actually moved anything.
Earlier warning of overload
Long days and shrinking breaks show up in Work times and the heatmap before they turn into missed deadlines.
What teams do with it
Most teams start with the productivity split and add the rest as questions come up.
Rate the first week's apps
The review queue fills up in the first days. Rating it early means the reports read correctly from the start.
Review by team, not by person
Team-level splits and comparisons answer most questions without anyone opening an individual minute.
Order a coach report for detail
The Productivity Coach writes a report on one person over a period, for managers who want the context behind the numbers.

What it does not do
Worth knowing before you rely on the numbers.
It does not judge the work
A productive minute means the application was rated productive. It says nothing about the quality of what was done in it.
It does not see off-screen work
Unless a work note is picked, time away from the keyboard is idle, and a locked screen records nothing at all.
It does not rate apps for you
The AI suggestion is a starting point. Until someone confirms a rating, the minutes stay neutral.
Teams that get the most out of it
Teams whose work happens mostly on a computer get the clearest split.
Software development
Time in IDEs, code review and documentation, separated from everything else.
Agencies
How design, writing and account work divide across tools.
Customer support
Time in the helpdesk and CRM compared with the rest of the day.
Finance and accounting
Spreadsheet and accounting tools rated productive for the teams that live in them.
Back-office operations
A signal when admin tools start taking longer than the work they support.
Research and education
Research, writing and communication time over a term or a project.
Other solutions worth a look
Every solution shares the same platform, so running two of them together needs no extra setup.
Get a clear baseline for team productivity
Start the free trial, rate the applications your team uses and read the first productivity split within a week.
No credit card required